About Me

Name: Mike Bates
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Chicago Sun-Times's Sweet Incorrectly Claims Romney Is Wrong on Obama's Defense Cuts

Lynn Sweet, Washington, D.C. bureau chief for the Chicago Sun-Times, covers the final presidential debate in "Sweet: Obama in command in campaign’s last clash" on the newspaper's Web site.  In the piece she writes:

As soon as Romney pledged not to cut military spending (incorrectly implying that was an Obama proposal — something he has done before) Obama pounced, portraying Romney as woefully uninformed about how a modern military measures its strike force.

In her enthusiasm, Sweet overlooked one thing: Obama does intend to cut defense sending.  Who says so?  Well, President Barack Obama for one.  From his July 15, 2011 press conference:

". . .I’ve said that in addition to the $400 billion that we’ve already cut from defense spending, we’re willing to look for hundreds of billions more."

Additionally, in his proposed Fiscal Year 2013 budget, Obama's own Office of Management and Budget shows (Page 103) that total national defense spending in FY 2011 was $717 billion while estimating it will be $566 in FY 2014.

This is a frustrating time for many in the mainstream media.  After helping make the totally unqualified Obama president, they're worried they might not get four more years of their favorite failure-in-chief.  Sweet's long been an Obama cheerleader.  In 2007 she regretted, after exercising while he did at Chicago's East Bank Club, that she couldn't "follow him into the locker room."

With the possibility of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney beating Obama, the MSM are circling the wagons.  It's anything goes time.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chicago Sun-Times: Michelle Obama 'Embraces an Activist Agenda'

We all know that Barack Obama, if he isn't actually divine, at least qualifies as a Superman.  So I guess it's fitting that he's married to a Superwoman.  Or at least that's the impression we get in today's Chicago Sun-Times article "Michelle: Her first month as first lady  THE EAST WING | In just a month, Michelle Obama has put her mark on her new domain, as she embraces an activist agenda."  Authored by Washington Bureau chief Lynn Sweet, the gushing appraisal begins:
It's Friday in the East Wing of the Obama White House, the realm of first lady Michelle Obama.

Many of the cream-colored walls are still bare. The Obama administration, after all, is just one month old.

But there is a growing photo collection in the hallways that charts the increasing activity of the first lady in the last two weeks as she settles in to her new role and starts expanding her portfolio of issues.

The newest item on her non-controversial agenda is healthy living. That's in addition to assisting military families, pushing work-family balance, national service, women's concerns and opening up the White House to the community.

Wow!  Can you imagine one woman accomplishing so very much so quickly?  But the fawning has just begun as Sweet moves on:

In this first month in the White House, Mrs. Obama has:

†Visited five federal agencies on her meet-and-greet tour. Besides Transportation, she has stopped at the Departments of Education, Interior, Housing and Urban Development and Agriculture, where she plugged fruits and vegetables.

†Become more familiar with her new city. She has lunched with Washington Mayor Adrian Fenty and Jill Biden, taken in a ballet with the family at the Kennedy Center and visited a community health center.

†Hosted an African-American History Month event at the White House.  "African-American slaves helped to build this house," she said.

†Discussed balancing family and work at a panel aimed at women at Howard University.

†And, of course, continued her key role as mom-in-chief to daughters Malia and Sasha, with an assist from her mother, Marion Robinson.

Now some spoilsports might question why Obama is spending time at so many Federal agencies.  It's not, after all, as though she's the one who was elected president and chief executive of those agencies.  Yet Sweet apparently sees such activism from Obama as positive.

And some grouches may point out that going to two lunches, showing up at a ballet and a community center, hosting an African-American History Month in your home, participating in a Howard University panel, and having your Mom help take care of your daughters doesn't come close to filling out a month.  Especially when you have a staff of 20 to lend a hand.

Lynn Sweet knows better.  So she quotes the first lady's chief of staff, Jackie Norris.  Obama is an "active presence" and "comes in wanting to be value-added and wanting to support the president and the president's agenda."  Thank heaven.  Would we want a first lady who's an inactive presence or - even more worrisome - doesn't insist on being value-added?

Sweet's puff piece is just the latest in a series of slavish Obamamania we've come to expect from the mainstream media.  If Obama's chief of staff ever leaves, Sweet would make an ideal replacement.  She knows an activist, value-added gal when she sees one.   

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »